Thursday saw the overturning of Harvey Weinstein’s 2020 rape conviction in New York, paving the path for a fresh trial.
The state Court of Appeals deemed the judge in the landmark #MeToo trial biased, citing improper rulings, including allowing women to testify about unconnected allegations.
In a 4-3 decision, the court stated, “The trial court wrongly admitted testimony of prior sexual acts not related to the case, serving no material non-propensity purpose.”
It further criticized the judge for allowing cross-examination on these allegations, painting Weinstein in a prejudicial light.
Judge Jenny Rivera termed these errors “egregious,” advocating for a new trial. Should prosecutors proceed, Weinstein's accusers may testify once more.
However, dissenting Judge Madeline Singas accused the majority of distorting facts and failing to acknowledge Weinstein's past assaults.
In a separate dissent, Judge Anthony Cannataro lamented the decision as a “regrettable step backwards.”
Weinstein's accusers expressed dismay and disbelief at the ruling. Louise Godbold, a former commercial producer who accused Weinstein of assault in 1991, described her reaction as visceral, echoing the sentiments of fellow survivors.
Actor Caitlin Dulany, who alleges Weinstein assaulted her in 1996, expressed deep shock and sadness.
Filipina-Italian model Ambra Battilana Gutierrez, another accuser, criticized the decision, highlighting systemic failures.
Dawn Dunning, a former actor and accuser, expressed astonishment at the legal technicalities but maintained pride in confronting Weinstein.
Attorney Lindsay Goldbrum, representing several accusers, decried the ruling as a setback for justice, apologizing to all retraumatized victims.
The decision drew disappointment from Alexandra Canosa’s attorney, labeling Weinstein a serial sexual predator.
0 Comments